DCP+Evaluate

Maximum: 6 Students are expected to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification in an objective manner based on testing, and to evaluate its impact on life, society and/or the environment. They are expected to explain how the product/solution could be improved as a result of these evaluations. Students are expected to evaluate their own performance at each stage of the design cycle and to suggest ways in which their performance could be improved. ** QUESTIONS YOUR EVALUATE SLIDE(S) SHOULD ANSWER ** · Do you feel your party will be successful? Why or why not? · What do you feel are the strengths and weaknesses of your design? · Do you feel your personal method(s) of working on the project was successful? · Do you feel your group’s method(s) of working on the project was successful? · Which part of the process do you feel you or your group did best? Why? · How could your/your group’s work be improved?
 * Criterion E: Evaluate **
 * ** Achievement level **  ||  ** Level descriptor  **  ||
 * 0 ||  The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.  ||
 * 1–2 ||  The student evaluates the product/solution or his or her own performance. The student makes some attempt to test the product/solution.  ||
 * 3–4 ||  The student evaluates the product/solution and his or her own performance and suggests ways in which these could be improved. The student tests the product/solution to evaluate it against the design specification.  ||
 * 5–6 || ** The student evaluates the success of the product/solution in an objective manner based on the results of testing, and the views of the intended users. The student provides an evaluation of his or her own performance at each stage of the design cycle and suggests improvements. The student provides an appropriate evaluation of the impact of the product/solution on life, society and/or the environment. ** ||