C&S+Design

GROUP
This could take the form of a mind-map (using open mind or do by hand and scan), list, or any format you find appropriate. //Include any and all ideas that come to mind//. Ideas will be evaluated, selected, and eliminated in the next task.

GROUP
This design should include details of the types of pages, fonts, colors, integration, etc. that you would use.

INDIVIDUAL
This evaluation should refer back directly to the statements you made in INVESTIGATION TASK 3. Remember, that a good evaluation does not just state what is good or bad, but provides support for the opinion.

GROUP
This task must indicate why you feel your chosen design is better for meeting the stated goal of the project and solving the problem than the other designs. This is critical - the decision here must be made**// in relation to the stated goal of the project. //**

** Criterion B: Design ** Maximum: 6 Students are expected to generate several feasible designs that meet the design specification and to evaluate these against the design specification. Students are then expected to select one design, justify their choice and evaluate this in detail against the design specification.
 * ** Achievement level ** || ** Level descriptor ** ||
 * 0 || The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below. ||
 * 1–2 || The student generates one design, and makes some attempt to justify this against the design specification. ||
 * 3–4 || The student generates a few designs, justifying the choice of one design and fully evaluating this against the design specification. ||
 * 5–6 || ** The student generates a range of feasible designs, each evaluated against the design specification. The student justifies the chosen design and evaluates it fully and critically against the design specification. ** ||